1. Didja accidentally blow through the whole, "We're using our real names" thing on registration? No problem, just send me (Mike) a Conversation message and I'll get you sorted, by which I mean hammered-into-obedient-line because I'm SO about having a lot of individuality-destroying, oppressive shit all over my forum.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. You're only as good as the harshest criticism you're willing to hear.
    Dismiss Notice

Approach to long form Writing (Example BTTF)

Discussion in 'Tips, Tricks & Talk' started by Michael Lückgen, Nov 16, 2020.

  1. Hey Guys,

    Long form writing is still a huge mystery to me.
    So I looked at some pieces of the score of Back to the Future and an analysis of it.
    It helped me a lot in understanding how to compose for a longer form.
    At least I think it did.

    I wanted to verify these insights by all the masters in here and maybe have an open discussion about approaches (because I'm pretty sure there is more than one way of doing it).

    So here are my insights from BTTF:

    - start with a motif

    - take your motif and reuse it to build other motifs or scales (tritone in this case), which then can be used in the score



    - develop a full theme out of the main motif

    - fragment the main theme and other motifs and use them throughout the score (develop them further by adding notes, inversion and so on...)

    - structurally do ABA'B' stuff on a smaller and or larger level (repeat and change it up to keep interest)

    Is this the trick to make everything cohesive, by deriving the whole score from one motif? Or at least lots of it, since Doc has his own Motif (minor 2nds).

    What do you guys think?
    Are these insights even correct?
    And how do you approach long form writing?

    In the How to Score a Film in 7 Days Score there are multiple themes, but the fragmentation part of it was done by Mike with at least one Theme if I remember correctly. Or am I on the wrong track here?
     
    George Streicher and TD Gary like this.
  2. Hey Michael

    First, it is great you are doing all this. Having some kind of "journal" for your music composing is very useful.

    Ultimately I think it is going to be you coming to peace, or having confidence, or acceptance (or whatever the right word is) of your piece.

    Are you writing music that you like? Of course there is always more to learn.

    My point is.... there is no empirical objective ruler by which you can say "This is great structure".

    There have been attempts.

    I don't know the exact ratio, but music is both an art and a science.(or craft if you prefer)

    Some people I know, who write splendid music, hate Beethoven. Go figure.

    It might also be said that great works ask as many questions as they provide answers.


    What is long-form to you? 6 minutes? An hour?

    Music is a series of acoustic events that unfold over time, playing with the memory and expectation of the listener for the desired affect.

    So, keep on learning and putting these things in a journal.

    At this point, the best answer I have for you is to try it out. See if you can use a single motif to create an entire score.

    Sure, ABA'B, but what other permutations can you derive. Keep looking at those you wish to emulate.

    You might want to look at early classical composers like Haydn whose entire output is basically devoted to the question you are asking.

    Perhaps the most practical way to gain craft, without getting lost in the abstract philosophical side is to practice theme and variations.
    This way you can have more of a Top/down approach. So let's say the A section to that piece was 16 measures long.

    If you write 10 variations you now have 160 measures. Additionally looking at larger forms than strophic ABAB will helpful.
     
  3. Thanks for your answer Doug!

    With long form I mean 20 minutes upwards stuff, which seems very intimidating to me to make it cohesive.
    The feedback I got on the 7 minute piece I did last time was that there are too many ideas and it gets all over the place, so I wanted to figure out how to make it more cohesive. I mean and I can't even keep it cohesive for 7 minutes, then how should I ever be able to do a 20-60 minute piece (not that I have to, but I like the idea to be able to do that).

    I will look into Haydn right away :)
    Hope I will be able to understand the structural side of it somehow.
    And I'll try to practice themes and variations some more.

    Are there any rules on larger forms? I think that is my main problem here, I like them but I can't wrap my head around it. Maybe I'm too analytic about it here. Are there any rules to the romantic symphonies? What kind of structure has the Planets? Or Mahlers 2nd? I get that Beethoven and earlier classical symphonies first movement is in sonata form (which is ABA on a larger scale right?) but on a smaller scale are they "just" playing around with their motif? How can I learn something like this?

    Thank you for your guidance!
     
    George Streicher and TD Gary like this.
  4. Well, I just think you are heading in the exact opposite direction I would advise.

    Sometimes we get things in our head, and can't shake them.
    There is also no shortcut for "paying your dues"

    Maybe your first goal is to write a really bad 25-minute piece. Then make the second one better, and so on.
    My first concerto, I certainly felt lost at sea, and I did a few things where now I go "oops" when I hear it.

    Got to break a few eggs to make an omelet,


    That said: I don't think long-form is what I would advise you to work on.

    Well, who said that? I certainly did not. I mentioned, (just being honest) that I could not make it past the 3-minute mark.
    For me, it was not that there were too many, just none that I liked.

    Your bass just sat there, no harmonic support for your melody, lack of rhythmic interest.

    I would say keep studying scores: write them out note for note by hand. Then write a variation on the section you like.

    It would be better to work with a smaller frame and get the material really solid first.

    "Moment form" is perfectly valid too. I posted a month or two ago I was transcribing this piece. It works great, and a new theme and idea every 20 seconds.


     
    TD Gary and Michael Lückgen like this.
  5. I see. I'm probably going ahead of myself.

    A few friends said, that there was just 'too much going on'. People who are not musicians seemed to be overwhelmed by it.

    You are right I should work more on the basics first.

    Will do!

    This is interesting. Probably I got something backwards about form and structure.

    Thanks again Doug!
     
    TD Gary likes this.
  6. Stand on the shoulder of giants.

    I would advise you to make scheme models of pieces you like. Wether it's back to the future, or the planets.

    For example below one possible model based on Harry Potter



    Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 1.18.35 am.png Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 1.18.43 am.png Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 1.17.59 am.png Screen Shot 2020-11-19 at 1.18.08 am.png
     

Share This Page