1. Didja accidentally blow through the whole, "We're using our real names" thing on registration? No problem, just send me (Mike) a Conversation message and I'll get you sorted, by which I mean hammered-into-obedient-line because I'm SO about having a lot of individuality-destroying, oppressive shit all over my forum.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. You're only as good as the harshest criticism you're willing to hear.
    Dismiss Notice

Soaring Above the Clouds

Discussion in 'Critique & Feedback' started by Francesco Bortolussi, Jul 15, 2018.

  1. Hi everyone!

    This piece is probably my greatest achievement, since it's the first one I recorded with a big live orchestra (40 musicians!). Not much to say here; I composed this piece during 3 very intense nights on the Christopher Young Scoring Program organized in Madrid this summer. The ending is maybe a little lazy (I had no time to refine it further) and some things did not work out as I intended when I was writing the music to paper. However, the result was quite nice, and the musicians really pulled out a great performance out of the 20 minutes they had.

    Here's the music I kind of "mixed" (mostly raw tracks) and the pdf of the score.

    The only question I might have is: do you guys think the quality of the audio can be greatly improved with a professional mix, or should I not worry about it too much?

    Enjoy! Any critique is very appreciated, since this is basically my first work with a real orchestra.

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/ex4kzr7m323sfjw/Soaring Above the Clouds - Full Score.pdf?dl=0

     
  2. Congratulations and thanks for sharing your achievement with us! Sounds like a great experience. I really enjoyed the composition and the performance and thought the audio quality served both just fine.
     
  3. Nice ! Bravo for writing for a real orchestra and getting it read.

    The real thing sure sounds great.
    ______________________________________________________________________________

    I have to be brief here but:

    This

    and this

    are where you grow from having a reading.

    You need A) distinguish clearly what/where the exact expected result was different than you thought.

    B) Once you distinguish this you either create a sample/real hybrid, or you move on and learn for next time.

    I am curious why you feel the need to further mix it. (I would think it would all depend on the session file and how they mic'd everything)


    From my perspective - and within this context - I thought the recording sounded better than I anticipated looking over your score.

    If it sounds "not as full" as you hoped that is 100% your orchestration. I can't go thru it now in detail here but looking at your score reminded me of a quote - I think it was Sibelius the composer - "The orchestra is a piano without the sustain pedal".

    Meaning you need to write in the sustain, and the resonance a orchestra creates is magic.

    __________________________________________________________________________________________

    The video below is an ensemble about the same size --- IDK.... about 40 right ?

    You can A/B what you did vs Jerry. Notice, not just where it sounds "fuller" but where he is working less hard than you and getting more out of the ensemble. Woodwinds are great for color. Weight...not so much. Solo use can be so effective.

    When the orchestra gets bigger it becomes almost imperceptible if the Oboe and Clar. are doubling the same melody 30 strings and 4 horns and 3 trumpets are playing too.

     
  4. Hey Francesco. Nice theme and very cool you had the opportunity to record it live with real orchestra. Sounds very cool. However I enjoyed both themes while I think the 2nd darker idea I wished you would have explored more. However orchestrationally it is a solid work. I wasn´t sure about to drop off the ryhthm on the snares completely after returning to your main motif. I would have kept one element repurposing the ryhthm "dada danndann" through then, probably I would have used some upper strings in the first repetition part and in the second the violins join switched that ryhthm to the higher woodwind department in order to maintain motion. When the dark theme at 2 something comes back it lacks of a bit of a intensified version. Maybe accenting and adding lower strings to the rhythm to add fullness would be the to go there. Apart from that I notice you are a fan of Sus4 to Major resolutions. While there is nothing wrong with that per se, I feel at 2:28 the resolution doesn´t fit that good to my personal taste prior with that dark motif. Maybe that was a bit lazy? I mean that suspended thing is a trick to find a way out of the motif to end. I think there are more interesting ways at that point. For instance you have gotten more dramatic doing this:

    Bbsus4 -> resolution to Bbmajor, then contrasting it with a Db minor (telling the audience no no we are not done yet folks) to Eflatsus4 resolution to Eflat major landing finally on a Ab major. On Aflat major the ending would sound a bit higher and fresher. I mean that is just stylistic thing and not the way someone has to go, just for an idea.
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  5. And don´t get me wrong: My critic is not saying the piece isn´t cool or great, just a bit nitpicking nothing more. :D
     
  6. Thank you all very much!

    -----------

    Let me address this: I think that the biggest let-down was the finale; it came out way clumsier than I anticipated, and I think it's mostly because I doubled the melody way too many times in unison instead of improving the texture. The result was that the melody was screamed almost in a painful way, and that the trumpets were almost completely buried (which is a big red flag in most situations). I think my orchestration in the first half was better than my second half (except some obvious mistakes, like the "forte" dynamic at 36 of the countermelody against the "mf" of the melody on the trumpets). I decided that I would double instruments way more than I would naturally, just because I was scared that the sound would be too thin compared to a 80/90-piece orchestra. It was probably a good call though, the sound came out okay.
    Another big issue I find on this piece is that the forward momentum is not as present as I was hoping for; although that's composition-related, not orchestration-related. And to be fair I would have probably not done it differently this time around, because I didn't know how good the players were, so I guess my main priority was to keep it simple.

    B) I will probably leave it and move on, I really value the idea of being able to write clean orchestration before muddying the water with samples and synthesizers. It really feels like cheating and I think I'll learn way more doing things this way.

    Just a little insecurity check. I have all the sections mic'd up plus 6-8 ambient/room/other general microphones, but I didn't really do much (just a couple of EQs/compressors here and there). It sounds fine to me but I'm way too biased to have any objectivity about it.

    I would really love if you could expand on this and give me examples (maybe from my score?) when you have more time. I think I get what you're saying, but a couple of examples here and there might lead me to the right direction.

    I guess this is the hardest part, and the thing I struggle the most with. But I'm confident that, if I continue to put in the work, I'll improve on this. I don't think there's any quick fix for this besides studying more and more! :D

    Thank you very much for the feedback.

    -----------

    Yeah I did drop the ball a little bit with the rhythm part. Some parts sound a little unsatisfying/empty without the percussive elements, or any kind of motion.

    You caught me! :D
    At that exact point in the piece I basically ran out of time, and I was like "I know I have to wrap it up and I know that this works!". Also, I didn't specify it here, but I was rescoring a movie scene, so my music was locked into the structure of the picture. It might have been bad planning on my part, but I only had time to go back into the main theme and finish in that amount of time. However if I treat it as a standalone piece, I could try and think of different ways to go back to the main theme. I'll definitely check your chord progression out tonight!

    Nitpicking is exactly why I'm posting music on this forum! :) I really really appreciate any kind of criticism.

    Thank you so much!
     
  7. And how do you manage to pay a 40 musicians orchestra, engineer, renting room, mixing guy etc?? Are you rich or did somebody throwed some money at you? :D
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  8. Neither :D
    it was part of the Christopher Young masterclass that took place in Madrid 3 weeks ago. All things considered (great classes, getting to really know Christopher, the orchestral recording, ...), it was a real bargain. I didn't have a mixing guy (did it myself) and the room was a theater, which produced a very interesting outcome sound-wise.

    I've heard that they're gonna organize it again next summer in Spain, only they're expanding the orchestra to 65 players. I'll definitely try to attend again next year, it was really great.
     
  9. I'll try with the time I have.

    I thought rehearsal letter C was the most successful (and it's return, although the 2nd time the violins are weakly orchestrated)
    I also like what you did at letter E.

    Since we have a lot a repeating material (Beethoven-esc ;)) this recording/score is a great way to compare different
    orchestrations of the same compositional gesture.

    Now some critique:

    Percussion 2: That was literally a "Free Money Party" for this person. Why didn't you use them at all ? Places like 35 scream out for cymbal or other colors. 57 is let down too by a solo percussion. It's so in the gestures of what the rest of the orchestra is doing that these are big hit point moments. If you want less "epic" you can always add in softer things like bowed vibes,waterphone, chorales (would be nice for the more spooky letter C section).
    Basically ......why is this staff even in the score ?



    One thing you can take away is to go research how your favorite scores create orchestral crescendo and as you mentioned "push the music forward". I think you will find much more "uniform" writing. For example this is your score at measure 56-57



    Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.51.52 AM.png

    Everyone has a different instruction. Some are getting louder, some are getting softer. Some carry over, others drop out.
    The orchestration is contradicting itself. The percussion above is totally sparse. The lack of forward motion is highlighted by the fact the percussion (and other instruments) aren't providing any support until the hit point. Double the violins on that run, and even the violas and octave lower. Speaking of the viola: You see how it is just doubling the Cello - well until the upper Cello disappear - this creates a wide space between your inner parts. Also we have viola in it's low register to balance with violins in their mid --- upper mid for 1 - register, and its doubling the tonic. Take it up an octave.

    Score study some big orchestral climaxes and see the difference.


    Screen Shot 2018-07-17 at 11.54.50 AM.png
    In this same measure the winds look like this. Why didn't you give the flute the run ? It's literally blocking the other parts.
    Again notice how everyone has a different dynamic instruction. Also, the G# in the winds gets a half note, but in violins we get a quarter etc......


    That's all I can go thru at the moment.

    Again, this is how you learn.....so hold your head up high. Now you have more accurate questions to investigate with your study.
    I think the players in a number of spots took the "spirit" of what you meant (deduced from hearing the other parts) and ignored some of your instructions because they knew it was not what you really meant. Some friendly lifting.

    I would personally be very happy with the recording you have.


    For orchestral resonance you could do worse than studying this score
     
  10. Thats really neat! Happy that you were able to gain such experiences there!
     
  11. @Francesco Bortolussi I enjoyed your track. The sound of the real orchestra was wonderful. I definitely do NOT think you need a pro mixer. You did great with the mix.

    Both @Doug Gibson and @Alexander Schiborr made some very insightful and valuable suggestions. If you were paying for private lessons you would not have any better feedback. As composers a lot of our decisions are based on our own personal aesthetic, and in that regard differing opinions are simply that, opinions or preferences and one persons choice can be equally valid with the opinion of any other person.

    However, when we begin to talk about what will get the most out of an orchestra of live musicians, we are on firmer ground. I believe the advice @Doug Gibson has given you in that regard is absolutely spot on.
     
    Francesco Bortolussi likes this.
  12. I was afraid that everyone had a fun part except the second percussionist, I didn't wanna have him sitting through the entire piece only to have 2 hits. Found out afterwards that the 2 percussionist divided the single percussion line among themselves anyway. It was a stupid/naive mistake on my part. I'm adding now some cymbals in post. It was a shame we didn't have any other percussion available except marimba, would have loved some other colors.

    It seems extremely obvious now in retrospect that I have some big consistency problems in dynamics, and I thank you for pointing them out. If you didn't maybe I would have easily glossed over them.

    Thank god for that :D I hope they enjoyed it.

    I feel like the rehearsal letter C is hard to fuck up, it's pretty simple in its intention :) I know what you mean on the "weakly orchestrated" parts though, and I feel like this piece has a lot of good intentions paired with weak execution. Although, I do think that it's only matter of studying/transcribing more.

    Thank you so much again for your time, I'm learning a lot. It's very humbling to see how far down the rabbit hole you can go. It's amazing how much complexity you can achieve with the same 15-20 instruments (lifetimes worth of study!).

    Thank you very much Paul! I agree 100%, I've got invaluable feedback and that's why I love this forum! Regarding orchestration, it really is all about chops. I can have the best idea in the world, but without the words I can't go far!

    -------------------------------------------------------

    We talked about the piece and its problems, but I wanted to take a second just to describe how wonderful the experience felt. Something magical happened when I heard the beginning for the first time: I had this thing I wanted to try, where you put the motion+harmony on the violins in the middle register and you play the melody with the french horns; it's pretty much everywhere, and I learned it transcribing parts of The Race, Rey's Theme, [...]. It's one of those counterintuitive things that should not work (the instruments are all playing in overlapping ranges), but that works wonderfully. I remember Mike telling the story about the first time he heard "the Hollywood sound" on one of his compositions; well - I knew that the technique would work just fine, but hearing it performed with my music made me go nuts. I really had this incredible feeling that I knew what I was doing (in the smallest way possible - at least for a couple of bars!). And I guess it was also all mixed with the experience of having your music played bit a giant group of experienced musicians, which does feel great.

    I'm sure you have similar stories - I wanted to share this because I know you'll be able to empathize with this kind of experience. The ones among you that recorded with a live orchestra know what I mean; and for the others: you definitely have to try it! A life-changing experience!
     
    Doug Gibson and John Eldridge like this.

Share This Page