1. Didja accidentally blow through the whole, "We're using our real names" thing on registration? No problem, just send me (Mike) a Conversation message and I'll get you sorted, by which I mean hammered-into-obedient-line because I'm SO about having a lot of individuality-destroying, oppressive shit all over my forum.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. You're only as good as the harshest criticism you're willing to hear.
    Dismiss Notice

Mixing headphones

Discussion in 'Current Gear' started by Rohann van Rensburg, Nov 30, 2017.

  1. Hi folks,

    Currently in a space not ideal for monitors, and need headphones for general use monitoring/mixing. I'm not an audio engineer so not looking for the best available tech, just something worthwhile as an investment that will work well with general compositional duties (mock ups and mixes, reference, etc).

    Bouncing around I found ATHM50x's ($180), AKG701/2 ($270), HD600s (on sale for $349), DT880/600ohm ($250). All in Canada. Running a Scarlett 18i8 (wall plugged, not USB powered).
    HD600s seem like the standard of sorts -- downside seems to be lack of clear highs and bass extension.
    DT880s seem clear with good freq balance but possibly fatiguing.
    K702s seem uncomfortable (I hate bumpy headbands), and no lows.
    M50xs sound pretty good (only ones I was able to find locally to test), but unsure if useful for longer periods and for accuracy. Will probably own them just for listening at some point though.

    I'm all for saving money but I'd rather invest properly at the outset. The Senns are on a fantastical deal but unsure of worth an extra $100.
     
  2. You should be fine whichever one of these you go with. Sonarworks has average profiles for all of them and you can get them all to sound very similar - nearly flat. There are differences, though, open/closed pads etc.

    Do be careful about impedance, and make your choices depending on how loud you want to listen to. Also, I don't think Focusrite provided actual specs for anything beyond 2i2 (which is USB-powered), so you might be in the dark. Expect DT-880 to be much quieter than M50x at same volume settings. Here's a great post about impedance which might help you further.

    Since these are all great cans and like I said with Sonarworks calibration they can come out pretty close to each other, you should definitely also take a look at comfort and durability. I can only speak for M50x as they're the only ones that I've used extensively. I've had them for 3 years. To me, very comfortable out of the box. My friend said they clamped his head too hard, but I didn't feel like that at any point. I've used them less frequently over the past year, and it was around last summer that they've started to show signs of wear on the cups (everything else is fine).
     
  3. Thanks, glad to hear that. The M50xs are the only ones I've tried. I'm wondering if open backed would be a better way to go for longer sessions. I'm seriously considering the HD600s as they're on sale for $350 down from 499 (as they seem praised for regular listening too), but I'm unsure they're worth the extra cash over the 880s or 50xs. My only concern with 880s is that without the Sonarworks plugin they're apparently sibilant and fatiguing.
     
  4. Depending on what exactly are you looking for.

    Open ended cans isolate noise very poorly and leak like crazy. They usually sound better because they leak like crazy (sound doesn't become "trapped" inside the pad). I've used Allen & Heath XD-53, and these became uncomfortable quick because they actually sit on your ear, and these were clamping pretty hard. I'm sure the more expensive and studio-oriented cans are more comfy. I've only heard good things about DT880 and HD650.

    Close ended have great isolation, some are comfortable to the point that you don't even physically sense that you're wearing them. After a few hours your ears can get pretty warm, though.

    So pick your poison. I am seeing the HD600 on Thomann for €320 but they don't seem to be on sale over there, so I guess you might still have time to make your decision. That price does look good and I'm very tempted right now. :D
     
  5. Sorry that first reply was a bit incomplete -- on a semi-new (old) phone that cooperates infrequently.

    Re: Focusrite. They're cryptic regarding their specs, but their site more or less said "AC is better than USB for powering cans". I'm sure I'd be able to get mileage out of 300ohm phones, unsure about 600ohm.

    Unfortunately I don't have access to high end phones here to try out. The M50xs and Focal Spirit Pro were the only ones available that I was interested in. Headband bumps don't do well with me so for $400+ the Focal were out. M50xs weren't bad actually. Trying to avoid "on ear" for the most part.

    How bad do open phones tend to be for bleeding in/out? Are bad earbuds similar in terms of lack of isolation or are tracks played at reasonable volumes very apparent across a room?

    Yeah either the 600 or 880 are my main options currently. Just unsure whether 600s are worth the extra $80. If I need a headphone amp with 880s then they will be. Haven't considered 650s, $450+ doesn't seem worth it for mixing cans that need more curve adjustment than 600s.


    PS:
     
  6. Generally, yeah, AC is better.

    The XD-53s I had some time ago were very leaky - you could hear almost everything around you, and you could hear them pretty clearly when someone else had them on. But in the end, that's what I bought them for back in the day.

    Oh man. Too bad I can't get them at that price, I'd have to pay customs duty and tax - combined with shipping it would turn out much more than the Thomann deal.
     
  7. Oh ..... let me ask a tech question:

    My main need for good sound is music transcription. I use for headphones



    for a amp:



    I mainly use it via USB. Do I need to plug in the adaptor too ? Does it make a difference. Anything else I need ?

    I gotta roll like a big boy you know.
     
    Rohann van Rensburg likes this.
  8. Can't answer the rest, but I have to say that the burl accents are most certainly worth the 50% price jump and will allow you to transcribe considerably more accurately.
     
  9. Cool. I already have the HD 598. I own the Oppo too. The guy at the high end headphone store sold me.
    All I had to do was put them on. I just said " This is Ear porn" .


    God knows I need all the help I can get !!!
     
  10. #10 Aaron Venture, Dec 4, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2017
    These cans are fairly sensitive. Their specs and tests rate them at ~99.0 dB SPL/mW. Do you think they're too quiet?

    I mentioned that I used A&H XD-53 some time ago. They were used for monitoring in very noisy environments. To do that, they needed to be louder than other sounds hitting my ears, and I needed them to be open ended so that I can talk with everyone else without having to take them off every few seconds);they needed to be super loud. I still remember to this day how my entire jaw vibrated on every kickdrum because of these cans. Of course, I used earplugs. There are people who do this kind of stuff without earplugs. I don't even wanna imagine.

    For a comparison of loudness to your cans (this'll maybe help Rohann too), a quick calculation using 1.00 V RMS will put us at (HD 598 is 300 ohms, XD-53 36 is ohms with ~102 SPL/mW sensitivity) at:

    HD 598:

    1.00 Volts/300 ohms = 0.00333 A * 1.00 V = 3.33 mW applied to headphones.

    3.33 mW is 5.23 dB louder than 1 mW so that puts us at 99db + 5.23db = 104.23db.

    XD-53:

    1.00 Volts/36 ohms = 0.02778 A * 1.00 V = 27.78 mW applied to headphones.

    27.78 mW is 14.44 dB louder than 1 mW do that puts us at 102db + 14.44db = 116.44db.

    As long as the signal isn't clipping, XD-53 are ~12.5 db louder than HD598 at the same volume setting. That's more than twice the perceived loudness at the same volume setting.

    My M50x have 38 ohms. I hardly ever turn the volume knob past the halfpoint. Unless you have hearing loss or you're transcribing under a jet engine, I think you're good.
     
  11. Thanks for the input and help here Aaron. The technical info is interesting, I wasn't sure how that conversion worked.

    I went with DT880's personally as I (unfortunately) think I'll be working with headphones more often than I'd like to, at least for a while, so comfort was a high priority. Hoping they'll work fine out of my 18i8, if not I may get a headphone amp (the cans were on sale for $245CAD). They should be decently suitable for mixing purposes too, just need to learn them for a while.

    I think if I had a bunch of cash to blow and was going to get a pair of cans purely for transcribing, I might grab AKG K701/K702's. The instrument separation and soundstage are apparently absurdly/unrealistically wide.

    Trying to think of some closed-cans for tracking/general use now too, or if I have to work in a louder space. M50x's seem like good contenders, as do DT770s. If I get Sonarworks Reference it works on an OS level too which I was happy to find out.

    How do you like your 598's Doug?
     
  12. I think you're gonna have a great time.

    I'm sure they will do more than fine.

    When the drivers burn in after ~100hrs of use and you get used to them, it'll be beautiful (you can cheat a bit on the burn in by having all different types of music play loudly on them and put them in a drawer or another room during the night).
     
  13. I'm wondering if Sonarworks is worth it. I think it "overcorrects" the 880/600's though, so I'm not sure if it's worth the cash. The OS plugin is really useful generally though, for transcription and the like. If I could, I'd boost the high mids a bit, cut the highs a hair and boost the low bass ever so slightly.
     
  14. It allows for small custom adjustments to the general correction curve.

    upload_2017-12-16_2-0-44.png

    What makes you think it over-corrects? They guarantee the average profile +/- 3db, which is essentially a 6db range. Depends on the cans I guess. Some may be a off by quite a margin in some areas. Others might just happen to hit the curve perfectly. Even if you send in your cans, you'll only get 50% more accuracy guarantee.

    But for me the average profile feels good - as I've probably said, switching from monitors to the cans feels very natural in terms of tone.
     
  15. Thanks, I did notice that and it helps. I'll have to play around a bit.

    I think it might be overcorrecting because they don't have an average profile for the 600ohm phones (which, at least according to Innerfidelity or the like, seems to have a considerably different average curve than the 250ohm). From what I remember, the peak at 8khz isn't as high (on average) on the 600's, and the mids aren't quite as recessed. Not sure how much of a difference this really makes though.
     
  16. #16 Aaron Venture, Dec 16, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2017
    If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, Equalizer APO for OS level sound on Windows. In a DAW, just add your preferred EQ after the Reference plugin.

    But you're overthinking the whole deal too much. You're not gonna get centibel-perfect frequency response with Sonarworks or any other way, either from headphones or speakers.

    And that's not the point of the tech. The point is to make it sound or rather feel natural. So that you don't have ridiculous spikes and nulls which would make some keys and notes sound better than others (that very much goes for bass response in speakers due to an untreated room). You don't want to waste time thinking if you're right, thinking about your cans' response and if the notes you're playing will translate well because of the spikes and nulls in your freq response.

    You don't want to think, you only want to do. And a near-flat frequency response will let you do. It doesn't have to be perfect. It can be 1, 2, 3 db off. That's much, much better than 10 db off and you'll have a much better time getting it right.
     
    Rohann van Rensburg likes this.
  17. #17 Rohann van Rensburg, Dec 17, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 17, 2017
    Thanks for the link! And good points. I want to avoid nitpicking too much, but my end goal is to pick something and stick with it long enough to simply learn it.

    I'm not so much interest in getting perfect flatness, but I'm simply noticing that the highs seem to be cut a little too much (I miss the detail) and the lows are a bit exaggerated. I'll play with some of Sonarworks' tweaking settings as I haven't really delved into them too deeply, but again, good points. Nothing more unproductive than messing with tech.

    EDIT: Didn't realize the other tweaking options. I also think the room calibration software might be a really good idea. I think I'll probably stick with this rather than nitpicking EQ, Lord knows how long I'll spend going down that rabbit hole...
     

Share This Page