1. Didja accidentally blow through the whole, "We're using our real names" thing on registration? No problem, just send me (Mike) a Conversation message and I'll get you sorted, by which I mean hammered-into-obedient-line because I'm SO about having a lot of individuality-destroying, oppressive shit all over my forum.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. You're only as good as the harshest criticism you're willing to hear.
    Dismiss Notice

Star Sword

Discussion in 'Critique & Feedback' started by Louis Calabrese, Sep 20, 2017.

  1. #121 Louis Calabrese, Dec 1, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2017
    From the delay standpoint, I should have said 1024 samples not 1000ms, which is close to what you have. So basically you have similar issues to me as delay and you just deal with it.

    I kinda know you can't really explain rubato and playing without a click...the 'feeling' if you will. I know you can't also explain balancing a template really either, because although you can give tactics and tricks it relies on your ear mostly.

    I really hope I figure this stuff out someday, it's been a difficult realization of where I'm really at with this thread.

    I was thinking about taking a piece I know well, that was materred well and try to reproduce it in the DAW.

    You have been helpful and patient, and I do very much appreciate it. I'm working on updating the Snowfall piece and will post over the weekend.
     
  2. Nah, don't go there. Nothing worth finding is down there. Everybody goes through this. More than once. And every time you fight it off, you grow a little.

    One way which will certainly help you and help build more confidence is setting short-term goals. Nothing like "I'll learn to write as good as John Williams" or "Mix as good as Shawn Murphy". Have these be your horizon. There are more immediate milestones on your way you can look forward to. For example:
    • I can take just the string section, mix it and make it sound good
    • I can use counterpoint to more easily develop ideas
    • I can write an interesting AABA piece
    Very simply stuff like that. These give you a graspable idea of the amount of work you have to do to reach them. Like, "Okay, I have this strings piece, now I'll just bring 'em up. Maybe make it a bit more clear. I'd like that bass out more. Add some warmth." Compare to other strings pieces. Go back to your own. Start simple, you only have 5 tracks to work with. Once you're satisfied, you'll feel like you achieved something, because while you actually did, you set yourself up to recognize it and you'll almost be able to taste it. Then write another strings piece and see if you can make it sound good again. Or, you know, apply the previous configuration and see if it works again. Great! Now you know something for certain!

    So what's next? Add a flute. Or flutes. Or a horn. Expand on these achieved goals and the foundation you've created and are now certain what it exactly consists of.
     
  3. "It worries me because there's a part of all this that just 'talent' beyond studying and hard work. Not everyone has it, and this entire thread has made me question if I really do have it enough to produce at a high level. I won't give up, but It's been very hard for me to push forward in this lately."

    @Louis Calabrese I should post you works from 2014 I did..so that you see how I was back then...it is not your lack of talent..believe me. I can understand that sometimes it feels so stony that you come up to that conclusion. Believe me I was and sometimes do that to..but I believe thats wrong. Just take time..there is no shortcuts..it takes fucking time..and time..Mike said that to me to..and he is right..
     
  4. @Alexander Schiborr
    @Aaron Venture

    Your right, those negative thoughts are pointless. In fact I tried to remove them from my post before anyone saw them but your responses were helpful and re-enforcing. Smaller objectives do make more sense - that and A/Bing with properly mastered tracks along with some transcribing as Mike would suggest.
     
  5. Heh, you can't edit out my email notification :D

    You'll get there, buddy.

    "Those who want to succeed will find a way, and those who don't will find an excuse." Or however that quote goes.
     
  6. #126 Doug Gibson, Dec 2, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2017
    [​IMG]

    A post is coming. Hang tight. This is my placeholder until I have the time to post fully
     
  7. You are lucky to hear on me, otherwise I would be a pissed dog :D
     
  8. #128 Alexander Schiborr, Dec 2, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 2, 2017
    Hey Louis here is a shitty music example me trying in 2014 to write an AABA Form with some Williams kind of stuff which completely failed. See that? Hope that makes you more motivate to see what shitty music I had written back then. Production value was also in the basement. Here we go :D I don´t share the shit normally, but here I feel we all need to share shit to make sure that we all do and did suck which is completely normal. Hear all that woodwind runs in the piece? man...and all that trying to say something but I got stuck into nothing and I wasn´t able to lead with my idea somewhere ..just repeating over and over with no end and no development. But what can I say..man..suck level at its best!!! :D

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/1p2upgfmgzm33sn/Back_in_Time_VTM_Vintage_2.mp3?dl=0
     
  9. It is not working in terms of what Louis wants also to learn and to work on: If you reduce that piece for 2 handed piano..its has a lot of issues also in voice leading and development. And it has literally no "red line" throughout the piece and I DIDNT sketch anything out before on piano.. I was trying to write a way over my capabilities but not realising that. So what I did is "reboot" my system and start from scratch. That meant in particular trying to learn how to write simple AABA themes on the Piano. Don´t let you blend or fool by the orchestration in the track..please..maybe there are some tits and bits of cool sounding bars but thats it..it makes not great coherent piece of music.
     
  10. You're perfectly right, but now I have to find a new adjective to qualify my own mistakes.
     
  11. Alex

    I'd say you definitely always paid attention to production value - although there were a few parts of this that sounded MIDI-like it wasn't bad at all to me. I can see a difference between your work today and this so that does demonstrate your part on growth over time. I definitely have a bit longer of a journey then you have from that point though...

    That being said, I think that I have to A/B more music right in my DAW in front of me - that and borrow all your ears out there for assistance.
     
  12. #133 Alexander Schiborr, Dec 3, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
    Yes, I tried back in 2014 too, but I wasn´t that good. By posting that example I just want to explain and show that everything takes time and practise. Sure everybody has a different starting level.

    What is your goal? Are there any music or composers how you love? I think a big part of learning is "to repeat" things. So for instance, lets say I love Back to the future from Silvestri. So how I approach trying to write something similiar from the vibe?

    1. I listen to the score a couple of times.
    2. I pick out one track, lets say the maintheme
    3. I look at the structure, what is real A part, what is real B and what are so called "transition modulations" for excitement.
    3. Then I try to transcribe the melody and the chords first and see why certain melodies and progressions are working: DO that. It is good ear training!
    4. Then I start sitting down and I am writing a melody which is similiar and in the same key over the same chord progressions first.
    5. I play around with that practise trying out different melodies to understand what anchors in the melodie tones are real outliners of the harmony or just passing notes in order to comprehend the why did Silvestri went by these tones and chords.
    6. I do that for a couple of days to internalize the stuff, so I learn all of those progressions in my head.
    7. And then I try to write a motif based on this progressions.
    8. I experiement and altering sometimes one chord to see what the difference can cause. I experiment with borrowed chords and short modal interchanges to "hide" the obvious heritage.
    9. BY repeating 1-9 over months..you start to develop and internalize "a style" and you start to make your little more own things out of that which do reference the typical original but are not just copycats.

    I dont know but did you ever did something like that?

    I do that with Works from Silvestri, Williams, Horner, also pop tunes from the 80s, Gospel Church music, also Mikes Music..E.g. I can play you dead through the races main motif in complete. I have that theme internalized in my mind, on my hands, I can write you a "version" of that. I learned all of Mike 12 Modulations, did you? Try them. They teach you a lot. You know..I am not saying: Hey look how cool I am, but trying to give you some answers why I progressed in my music since 2014. And I think a huge part of that is not that I am such of talented guy, I think because I am very hard-working, sometimes I feel more than others. I don´t say that this would work for you, every body has a different learning curve, but for me I understood pretty quick that I have to practise and repeat a lot to learn. Imo you can compensate other peoples natural talent by beeing dedicated. If you are able to live that attitude on a constant level through a couple of years you will make steps forwards I guarantee you that. I tell you that I believe most people fail because this working schedulde and working ethic is too uncomfortable PLUS not everybody is able to work like that because of other things like a regular job, family duties. SO there is the thing of decision of life. what is your goal? What would be possible for you considering your single case. I don´t know any background so this you have to answer for yourself.
    Why is a thomas Bergersen so good in what he is doing? Because he busted his ass off...like there is no tomorrow..why is Mike Verta such of a allrounder composer and be able to write on a level of almost "John Williams"? Because he did and still do bust his ass off while others go to party he sits probably at home and plays the indians Jones theme in all 12 keys and modulates the hell out of it. Yeah..somewhere there is the truth for me: There are people how are insanely having the need to be outstanding in something and so they get nervous when they don´t practise one day on their craft. I don´t say that this practise is healthy at all. You need to make sure to have a balance in life.
    For me for instance I try not to get insane with that. I have sessions where I start at 7 in the morning and at 10 in the evening I look at the damn clock and feel there is something a bit wrong with me..so I stop. But that happens not that often.
     
  13. #134 Louis Calabrese, Dec 3, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
    If you don't think naturally talented and hard work is what did it, then I have hope. I have a regular job, family and friends, but not a wife and kids of my own yet. I can spend 3-4 hours a night and long days on the weekend on this. I also spent time on the train on my commute listening to music as well. I am determined and I don't give up easily. In fact, I'd have to be careful because if I was left to my own devices I would spent 12 hours every day doing this - I don't tire of it!

    I'm a hard worker, dedicated student, and usually my progression on learning topics is pretty linear, but I've been 'stuck' in music for a while now. It's what led me to this forum and thread. Hopefully this will be a breaking through moment in my development.

    As far as what I want to create? My objectives are similar to you - Williams, Horner, Silverstri etc. I like epic and TSFH stuff as well but the great Hollywood composers are my targets. And I've listed to Hollywood film music countless times in my life. I probably watched BTTF 1000 times in my life, still watch ST TNG, and I've fallen asleep to the Braveheart score more times then I can remember. I'm a typical American movie and TV nut and have watched more shows then I probably should have.

    Too bad I don't have that pill from Limitless - I have all the knowledge in my head, I just can't access and organize it in a way to express it in music.

    I guess I have to just take these piece's into my DAW and analyze them far more then I ever have. Bar by bar, measure by measure and extract the orchestration and composition ideas they have.

    EDIT - Oh, and I have picked out a theme that I know very well and am analyzing it side by side with my piece. It's a piece that I can use ideas for my Snowfall piece, and i'm mocking it up to see if I can balance my template. And, which is a massive challenge for me, I'm not using any click track on the mockup.
     
  14. OK, so I'm targeting a mockup of a piece I know very well that I'm attempting to balance my template to, work on rubato with, and extract ideas for my snowfall piece.

    The snowfall piece is AABA, and I'd like to write it in the theme of what you heard. Strings and brass, with a highlight of flutes.

    To the Rubato / non click track point - Do you ever use a click track or is everything you mock up just on your internal rhythm? I don't think I can do fast ostinatos or driving staccato instrument / drum parts evenly without a click. Also without a click I can't 'slow it down' to play it in either. Free flowing, slower parts I think I can, just not the fast stuff - thoughts on this?
     
  15. #136 Alexander Schiborr, Dec 3, 2017
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
    Thank you for the infos.

    Short thing regarding talent (just my opinion of course):

    It is of course not all talent! Talent is a good factor but ..most people are not beeing succesful not because of lack of talent but because of lack of the right working ethic and the way how they learn / practise. = This is my opinion based on a few experiences in my life. So this is nothing scientific here. I would say that of course talent exists for sure, and talented people have it easier to achieve things..but I see that the right working ethic is often underestimated and often this " I have a lack of talent reponse" is used for the reason to be safe. Having said that: Imo you can compensate quite a lot by beeing dedicated. It probably won´t make you a caliber of a John Williams without any talent but it will bring a descent amount of distance closer to him.


    .
     
    Louis Calabrese likes this.
  16. I don't always do click-free. It depends on the piece. If it relies on rhythmic figures, I'll play to the click but won't correct all the mistakes. If I like it, I'll leave it. I will then conduct the piece in Reaper - I've created a custom action that consists of Tap tempo and Move edit cursor forward one beat. So if I want to take a breath at some place, I just slow down, then speed back up.

    Tempo tap is always measuring the taps, so there will always be some tempo differences and the tempo line won't be perfectly flat. It's not perfect, it's still averaging the last two taps instead of last one, so any sudden speed-ups or slow-downs have to be edited. Also I can't do it during playback. It definitely helps, though. Combine that with mistakes during playing, and you're already closer to a "live" feeling than if you just clicked in notes to a locked tempo.

    I feel like the only next step would be to git gud and do it all without the click, even the fast shorts. With my current skills the 1024 buffer makes this nearly impossible at the moment.
     
    Alexander Schiborr likes this.
  17. Ahhh, that makes sense, you do a hybrid. Aside question. Is Reaper your main DAW? I used it when I started out but moved to Sonar afterwards. Gibson just announced they are shutting down Sonar so i need to switch to a new DAW. I could go back to reaper, I read there are some nice updates, but I hear lots of people love Cubase.
     
    Alexander Schiborr likes this.
  18. Reaper is a software you have to tinker with if you want basic functions that you find in others DAW. That's why I prefer Cubase.
     
    Louis Calabrese likes this.
  19. I'm split. I'm an IT guy (don't mind messing with software) and really liked Reaper but it lacked a notation editor that it now has. There is also a cheap crossgrade price for Cubase which is nice.

    Ugh, I just want to make music and work on the pieces mentioned above. Too many tangents, and I didn't want to deal with this now.
     

Share This Page