1. Didja accidentally blow through the whole, "We're using our real names" thing on registration? No problem, just send me (Mike) a Conversation message and I'll get you sorted, by which I mean hammered-into-obedient-line because I'm SO about having a lot of individuality-destroying, oppressive shit all over my forum.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. You're only as good as the harshest criticism you're willing to hear.
    Dismiss Notice

Once Upon A Midnight Grimm - A Symphonic Halloween Tale

Discussion in 'Critique & Feedback' started by Paul T McGraw, Oct 19, 2017.

  1. "On Halloween night, fog and mist hang over the old abandoned graveyard. As a distant bell strikes midnight, apparitions slowly begin to gather: ghosts, ghouls, skeletons, trolls, goblins and all manner of scary things. All turn to look upon a particularly ugly and disgusting ghoul holding a large gong. He strikes the gong. Stillness hangs over the old graveyard for a moment, and then the smaller ghosts and ghouls begin to dance. Soon all of the creatures are dancing and prancing across the graveyard. When the largest trolls and goblins take a turn, they frighten away all the other creatures, who only slowly return when the big trolls and goblins wander off. As their time is drawing to a close, they all jump, whirl, and leap with the greatest of abandon. Then the far-off bell strikes one o'clock, and quiet stillness settles upon the old graveyard until the next All Hallows Eve."



    I have also attached the score. @Mike Verta gave me some great advice about this piece back in July. He was looking at a piece in Sonata form and about 11 minutes in length. He said cut it to 6 minutes. Whoa! So I almost did. I totally got rid of the recapitulation and kept only my best material. At that point it was 6:30. Then I kept adding back new material, bridging sections and expanding on my best ideas. Now it is back up to 8:30 and if I don't stop myself, it will just keep growing, like THE THING. Anyway, I hope someone likes it.

    All comments are appreciated, good or bad.
     

    Attached Files:

    Aaron Venture and Matthias Calis like this.

  2. I only had time to skim through it:

    If it was I, more variations in Tempo. In the middle --- around 3;30 - 4:20 (love that number) and onwards, it gets too "plodding" for my liking.
    You are @ 90 - 92 bpm ? I have not looked at the score. Just my first impression that this is really keeping the energy away.
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  3. Hi Doug,

    Yes, you could be right about the tempo. I played around with tempos in this piece a lot. They change quite often, but only by a small amount each time. I have worked with this piece so long, and tried so many different tempos, that I have lost any kind of ability to objectively decide. Finally I just had to stop playing with it and say "enough". But I certainly would not be opposed to a faster tempo. Too fast and the piece loses it's mock seriousness. Too slow and as you say it sounds plodding.

    The main thing is, did you like it? Did it entertain you?
     
  4. Because it's Halloween stuff and I am an elfmaniac, I feel obliged to leave a comment.

    Your piece becomes better and better as it develops but there's two things that bothers me a little.

    First is the intro. It starts great but it's getting too 'major' between 0:50 and 1:05. Is Zarathustra buried in that cemetery ? At my ears it sounds like a stranger part with some dissonances to justify its presence.

    Second is the part at 1:31. 'Only bass and melody' is ok for me but the harmony take long to come and only for a really short time it's really frustrating because just next to it you do exactly the same thing with a more long period whithout the harmony. Arrrrrgh.

    VoilĂ . It's just a humble opinion cause I'm far far away to write music like this. Paul, your piece is great and I'd like to have your talent. :)
     
    Matthias Calis and Paul T McGraw like this.
  5. Hi Sylvain,

    Thank you for listening, for commenting, and for the compliment. I am really glad you liked it, despite the sections that annoyed you. I understand what you are telling me, and will be mindful of the need to have more harmony filled out.

    I do have one thing to offer that might be helpful to think about. Just as @Mike Verta talks about how there is no "big" without "small", there is also, in my opinion, no "dissonance" without "consonance". That is why I let the section of the piece at around the 1-minute mark get very (almost completely) consonant so that the impact of the trumpets will be greater when they hit their big screaming dissonant notes at 1:11.

    Thanks again for listening. It means a lot.
     
  6. I don't really have the time to be as extensive as I'd like to be, but here are some notes anyway. Disclaimer: I'm just a meddling hobbyist at this point, take everything I say with a grain of salt.

    0:00 - 0:34 Good opening in my view. Sets the mood nicely. The bass clarinet is very appropriate here. The only suggestion I'd have is to perhaps have a quiet, low piano note double the tubular bell, it'll give it more weight, more ring, and a bit more tonality. Tubular bell + piano is a really nice combi, I've found. Up to you though!

    0:34 - 1:28 For me, all of this works just fine too. I'm still very much with you here and there are some wonderful chords in there. They do sound very classical, which is probably not just the chords but also the instrumentation. I don't see any markings for mutes on the brass in the score, but that's something you might want to try. I personally find that muted brass can add some real bite and make things feel more mean. Could be worth trying on the trumpets here?


    1:31 Tamtam transition was nice and effective!

    1:32 This section with the bassoon and bass clarinet is just begging for some pizz support from the cellos and/or basses, just to give little accents to this quirky start. I'm thinking of In The Hall of The Mountain King here. Not saying you should replicate that, but that's the sort of tone I imagine would be fitting here. From here on out I was starting to feel that some bits were a bit bare and could use a little embellishment. It's always slippery slope to add things, but I think some of your ideas from here on out can really be enriched with a little support from instruments, even it's just throwing in some accents. That said, the high woods have a really nice line here. Really good stuff. I just miss the "swing" or... waltz like feel that I think you're going for, and that's where I think throwing in some pizz could help out.

    1:56 I can see that you've written fp in the score here, it's just the samples letting you down here. I expected a stronger attack/accent here... basically the fp you wrote but that your samples just didn't provide.

    1:58 Okay, I can't really put my finger on it, but this bit feels a little too static/robotic to me. I'm missing some element of forward motion. In my head I'm hearing high woodwinds playing quiet 1/8's (on F) over this with light accents on the 1 and 4. So: ONE-two-three FOUR-five-six, ONE-two-three FOUR-five-six, etc (so that's on bar 65-72). Not saying that this is what you should do exactly (nor do I think should you have eights for 7 bars straight, those players will need to be able to breathe), my larger point is simply that I'm missing some forward motion. I guess what it comes down to is that, since this is a restatement, I want to feel like we're progressing and developing beyond a simple color change, if that makes sense?

    2:10 This could be your samples, but the Xylophone here is very intrusive in my view. I don't think it's the appropiate color for having the melody. Now, this is probably my bias, but I tend to use Xylophone for accents, rolls, gliss, arpeggios, that kind of stuff... it doesn't feel right to me to have it on the melody. What I think you're trying to do here is add a quirky, somewhat comical quality... I think you'd be better served by a Celeste here and just use the Xylophone for accents. You're use of the xylophone at 2:18 feels exactly right, I love that trill effect it has there. But everything before that? I don't dig as much! (purely talking about the Xylo here, the rest is fine!)

    I'm going to have to stop here, though I did listen to the rest of the piece. Overall I think you have very strong ideas and I can't argue with most of your instrumentation. My general remarks would be that there are sections where the overall piece feels too bare for my tastes... it's like there's only two gnomes and one troll coming out instead of a whole army of them. I'm missing some depth or richness here and there. Thankfully, this is much easier to solve than having to remove elements! In plain English: I feel like some sections are underwritten and could do with more embellishment or counter movements...just to add a little more interest.

    My other general remark would be that I think the tempo is too slow. Not for the start, but ones these creatures start to come out, it feels too casual and relaxed to my ear. I'd imagine this dance of Halloween monsters would be more frantic. You don't have to go fast everywhere, but some variations in tempo would do a lot for your piece, I think!

    And yeah, I think you can still easily bring this down to 6 minutes! (tempo changes can help here haha, you won't have to throw away any notes!)
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  7. Hi Mathias,

    Thank you for listening, and for taking the time to make such detailed comments. I also am a hobbyist (despite a music degree and about 56 years of experience listening to classical music) so we are in the same boat in that regard. It seems you are not the only one to think the tempo too slow. After giving this piece a break for a few more days, I think I will try again to experiment with tempo.

    You had lots of good ideas regarding orchestration. When I get back into the piece I will give them a try. The fp in the brass I am sure I can fix. I will just have to layer in an additional staccato attack to give it more punch. I don't like layering usually (or using an a2 or section sample for a solo part) because it becomes so easy to deceive ourselves about what a live orchestra could accomplish. But in this case, I think it is appropriate.

    The xylophone, ah yes, the xylophone. I have gone back and forth in my mind about that a lot. You are exactly correct that I wanted a kind of quirky, sort of comical quality. I was trying to stay away from Celeste (overused in my view since Harry Potter) but I might experiment with vibraphone. I also have a Spitfire percussion library, and that Xylophone might be better. I'll give it a try.

    Thanks again and I hope you had some fun listening to it.
     
    Matthias Calis likes this.
  8. Sounds like an excellent plan to give it a break for a little while. That remains to be one of the most useful strategies to get a fresh look at one's own work.

    You're right that Celeste is perhaps a bit overused, but should that really deter you? Don't get me wrong! I have my own set of instruments that I tend to steer away from and I'm utterly biased in regards to Celeste since I personally find it one of the most beautiful instruments there is in the orchestra. Having said that, I distinctly remember disliking oboes...then I had a project (I do some student projects sometimes) come up where it simply was the right fit. Since then, I've really learned to appreciate that instrument. My main complaint against it was that I often found it too piercing and nasal, but after I simply had to use it... I've turned my stance around completely.

    All of which is a very roundabout way of saying that, while I have my own biases for/against certain instruments, sometimes it worth a try to just try things. It can really lead to surprising and interesting results. Which doesn't mean you have to use Celeste! Just use whatever you feel gets the emotion you're going for across best. Best of luck with it! For the record: I really enjoyed listening to your piece, so don't let my comments lead you to think that there's something wrong with your piece. I'm with you (and the piece for that matter) about ~80% of the piece, and some things are simply a matter of differing tastes. I'll gladly take another listen if you've made changes, and I'll see if I can find the time to continue comments for everything beyond the 2nd minute.
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  9. In response to the feedback I received in this thread, I increased the tempo some in the dancelike sections. Could I have increased it more? I really am not sure. It seems like a lot to me, and if I go faster, the character of the piece changes beyond what I wanted. Second, I did try out the vibraphone instead of xylophone and I liked it, so I left it in. The link in my OP has been updated with the new version.

    I do think it is a little bit better as a result. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
     
  10. Compositionally and orchestrationally, I can't really add to this much more. More advanced composers than me will be able to point out a few more things, I'm sure, but I can't find much flaw with it at the moment.

    I do like the tempo changes! Feels much more lively now. There are a couple of places where the samples aren't working so great (though I do like the sound of your muted brass quite a bit!). it got a bit chaotic toward the end too, but that's largely down to the samples again. Overall, I really quite enjoyed listening to this piece! Well done! I can only hope that one day you'll get to record it with a real orchestra as I think they could inject that last bit of life into the composition.

    EDIT: the only nitpick I can come up with is that I still feel the piece could be just a smidge shorter, but this is a hard balance to achieve. The first four minutes are absolutely fine and feel very fresh, but after about halfway through the piece things are restated a little too much for my personal taste. This is a minor nitpick though! Again, I must emphasize that I enjoyed listening to this piece! You really managed to capture the mood, in my opinion!
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  11. #11 Michael Antrum, Oct 27, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 27, 2017
    Hi Paul,

    First of all, what an atmospheric piece of music. I really like it, and I am finding some interesting things in your score (thanks for that BTW) for me to chew on.

    The thing that stands out most for me is that dancing section, and I can see that you are musically suggesting the smaller ghosts and ghouls coming out to play.

    I see that you have been playing around with the tempo to suggest a little more life and movement, and, well, a sense of mischief - but I don't think that is where the solution lies. In the initial dance section you have the Flute and Clarinet playing together. I think the that problem here is the articulation used, what seems to be a constant key velocity and too perfect timing.

    I would suggest you could try using Staccatissimo on the Flute & Clarinet, and then dub it live over the top. This is main theme, the ear will latch onto it, and humanising the velocity and timing a little will make your ghouls seem little more chaotic and real. The Bassoon and Bass Clarinet lines will keep your timing reasonably honest,

    Here's a couple of bars of Berlin WW Clar/Flt Staccatissimo. (just doubled for now). I think it sounds more playful.

    Ghosties & Goulies

    I'm still working my way through the rest of the piece, but this is a thoroughly engaging piece of music that marries with the story beautifully.

    Great work.
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.

  12. On a scale of 1-10 how happy are YOU with the final version ? Do you have any specific questions, or just gauging listeners feedback.
    (both are perfectly valid)

    Basically, if there is anything specific craft wise you are questioning I am happy to offer my 2 cents.

    If you are perfectly happy with everything, then that is a great blessing too. There are times when one just needs to say " this work is done"

    Wishing you all the best
     
    Paul T McGraw likes this.
  13. Thanks for the kind words, and thanks for the suggestion. I had tried having the flutes and clarinets staccato at one point, but it is worth trying again. I will experiment a bit with that and respond on Saturday. Bedtime for us old guys right now. Thanks. :)
     
  14. Hi Doug,

    I think this is the best thing I have ever written, and since I have been writing music since High School, that is really something. I destroyed most of my compositions about 5 years ago when I decided that what I really wanted to write was in the late romantic idiom. It has taken me a lot of study to get this far, but it has been fun.

    Sorry for that off-topic stuff. I feel Grimm could be finished right now, but I am reluctant to stop working on Grimm, it is my baby and I am proud of it. But I know that I really need to move on to writing other things. I always enjoy getting ideas and I try them out. Sometimes they work for me, sometimes not. But I learn something new in the process. I benefit from hearing what people like and dislike in the same way. I know one can tie oneself into knots trying to please others, as Bruckner did, so I know I should be careful to stay true to my own aesthetic vision.

    Sometimes I am very certain that I wrote exactly what I meant to write. That is the best feeling, when one is certain that the musical expression matches the artistic vision for the composition. So, once I try Michael's articulation suggestion, I think I will declare this one done.

    I am already working on my next piece and will be posting some sort of pre-orchestrated thing here for reaction and suggestions. I think I will post the A theme group, rather than the whole piece, since I am just starting on the B theme group. Thanks for all of the reactions, comments and suggestions.
     
  15. You were right. Thank you! I tried using the flutes and clarinets staccatissimo throughout or mixing staccatissimo and holding the long notes. I went with the later, as it offers more contrast with the low winds.
     
  16. #16 Paul T McGraw, Oct 29, 2017
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2017
    Thank you to everyone who offered me help and advice on "Once Upon A Midnight Grimm." Thank you @Gregory D. Moore @Doug Gibson @Sylvain PROVENZANO @Matthias Calis and @Michael Antrum for all of the great suggestions. Special thanks to @Mike Verta for advice on several small things but mainly the structure, Thank you, Mike, for always giving honest feedback and advice. Also, William Kersten, Guy Bacos, and Jay Bacal gave me some great mixing tips. HOWEVER, any faults and imperfections in the mix or in the composition are mine alone and not the fault of anyone else.

    Here is a link to the finalized (I hope) piece on Orfium.

    Once Upon A Midnight Grimm

    Orfium offers 320 kbs MP3 as opposed to only 128 kbs MP3 on Soundcloud. There are other features on Orfium that I also like better. I also updated the Soundcloud file. Thanks, gentlemen. You are all fine examples of artist helping artist.
     

Share This Page